000 02210nam a2200277 i 4500
001 US0525400307
003 OSt
008 091130s2006 us f 001 0 eng d
020 _a0-8014-4454-3
040 _aUCA-HUM
_cUCA
100 1 _aFudge, Erica
245 1 0 _aBrutal reasoning :
_banimals, rationality, and humanity in early modern England /
_cErica Fudge
260 _aIthaca :
_bCornell University Press,
_c2006
300 _aX, 224 p. ;
_c23 cm
500 _aÍndice
504 _aBibliografía
520 _aEarly modern English thinkers were fascinated by the subject of animal rationality, even before the appearance of Descartes's Discourse on the Method (1637) and its famous declaration of the automatism of animals. But as Erica Fudge relates in Brutal Reasoning, the discussions were not as straightforward-or as reflexively anthropocentric-as has been assumed.Surveying a wide range of texts-religious, philosophical, literary, even comic-Fudge explains the crucial role that reason played in conceptualizations of the human and the animal, as well as the distinctions between the two. Brutal Reasoning looks at the ways in which humans were conceptualized, at what being "human" meant, and at how humans could lose their humanity. It also takes up the questions of what made an animal an animal, why animals were studied the early modern period, and at how people understood, and misunderstood, what they saw when they did look.From the influence of classical thinking on the human-animal divide and debates surrounding the rationality of women, children, and Native Americans to the frequent references in popular and pedagogical texts to Morocco the Intelligent Horse, Fudge gives a new and vital context to the human perception of animals in this period. At the same time, she challenges overly simplistic notions about early modern attitudes to animals and about the impact of those attitudes on modern culture.
650 0 4 _aAnimales
_xHábitos y conducta
_912818
650 0 4 _aAnimales
_xInteligencia
650 0 4 _aAnimales
_zEuropa
_y15..-16..
909 _bhum
_c-
942 _n0
998 _b0
_c091202
_dm
_ea
_f-
_g0
907 0 _aejc
_bhum091211
907 _a84ds2
999 _c858770
_d858770